Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Bader et al v. FCA US, LLC. et al
as 3:2019cv06970
Plaintiff:
Steve Lebeau, Tobran Tillman, Michael J. Dilley and others
Defendant:
Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James R. Johnson v. L. J. Milusnic
as 2:2018cv08534
Petitioner:
James R. Johnson
Respondent:
Warden L. J. Milusnic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. State of California et al
as 2:2018cv01724
Plaintiff:
James Edward Johnson
Defendant:
State of California, City of Yreka, Yreka Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James R. Johnson v. Steven L. Myers et al
as 3:2017cv02154
Defendant:
Steven L. Myers , Myers Johnson Inc., Stephen A. Burke and others
Plaintiff:
James R. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv02615
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Johnson
Defendant:
Carloyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv01040
Plaintiff:
James Charles Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016at00558
Plaintiff:
James Charles Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation v. Paramount Scaffold, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00861
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees for the Carpenters Southwest Trusts and Carpenters Southwest Adminstrative Corporation
Defendant:
California Access Scaffold, LLC, Does, Daniel Eugene Johnson and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014at01616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
