Cases 41 - 50 of 58
TeaCups, Puppies and Boutique LLC et al v. Anderson et al
as 0:2013cv61573
Plaintiff:
TeaCups, Puppies and Boutique LLC and Eleonora Bonfini
Defendant:
James Anderson , Puppy Collection Inc and Teacup Puppies Store Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Anderson v. United States of America
as 5:2013cv00066
Plaintiff:
Larry James Anderson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Anderson v. Peshiek et al
as 3:2012cv01220
Plaintiff:
Richard James Anderson, Sr
Defendant:
Renee Peshiek, Val Quetti, Gary Smolek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamze v. Cummings et al
as 0:2012cv61356
Defendant:
Cummings, James Anderson, Charles Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Abdelaziz Bilal Hamze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Pastrana et al
as 5:2012cv00200
Plaintiff:
Larry James Anderson
Defendant:
Jorge L. Pastrana, FNU Flountroy, FNU Buggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Desravines v. Apopka Police Department et al
as 6:2011cv00732
Plaintiff:
Peterson Desravines
Defendant:
Apopka Police Department, James Anderson, City of Apopka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Berger
as 3:2010cv00921
Plaintiff:
Richard James Anderson, Sr.
Defendant:
Wendy W. Berger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Shoar, et al.
as 3:2010cv00188
Plaintiff:
Richard James Anderson, Sr.
Defendant:
David B. Shoar, S. Bickhart, S. Staggers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Boles et al
as 3:2010cv00066
Plaintiff:
Richard James Anderson, Sr
Defendant:
Joe Boles, David B. Shoar, P. F. Cyr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Boles et al
as 3:2010cv00017
Plaintiff:
Richard James Anderson, Sr.
Defendant:
Joe Boles, David B. Shoar, P.F. Cyr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
