Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Wolfe v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv01946
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Wolfe
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Pennsylvania Board of Parole, Pennsylvania Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOLFE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 3:2020cv00211
Respondent:
WARDEN, SCI HUNTINGDON and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
JAMES ANTHONY WOLFE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCCAMMON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2020cv00172
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTHONY MCCAMMON
MONTAGUE v. MONTAGUE
as 2:2019cv02898
Plaintiff:
MR. JAMES ANTHONY MONTAGUE
Defendant:
LILIAN VIOLETA MONTAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COOPER v. LAMMENDOLA
as 2:2019cv01004
Defendant:
JAMES ANTHONY LAMMENDOLA
Plaintiff:
JALIL COOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strausbaugh v. Greentree Servicing LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01433
Plaintiff:
Michael Strausbaugh
Defendant:
Greentree Servicing LLC, KML Law Group PC, Jill P Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Strausbaugh v. Greentree Servicing LLC et al
as 4:2015cv01433
Plaintiff:
Michael Strausbaugh
Defendant:
Greentree Servicing LLC, KML Law Group PC, Jill P Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BARNES v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv05099
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTHONY BARNES
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
UPSHUR v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DAUPHIN COUNTY et al
as 2:2012cv03208
Plaintiff:
ALBERT UPSHUR
Defendant:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DAUPHIN COUNTY, TOM CORBETT, JOSEPH H. KLEINFELTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
