Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Brown et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00906
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Brown, David Daniel Ackman, Richard Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Culbreth v. Crow et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00886
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall and John Crow
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Culbreth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stokes v. Credit One Bank (MAG+)
as 2:2018cv00051
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Stokes, III
Defendant:
Credit One Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Stokes v. M&T Bank et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2018cv00049
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Stokes, III
Defendant:
M&T Bank and Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engel, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Stokes v. Wells Fargo (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2018cv00048
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Stokes, III
Defendant:
Wells Fargo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Stokes v. Navient Department of Education Loan Servicing (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2018cv00047
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Stokes, III
Defendant:
Navient Department of Education Loan Servicing
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Stokes v. Santander Consumer USA (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2018cv00050
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Stokes, III
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Miller v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00584
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Miller
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stovall v. Vowell et al
as 7:2012cv02442
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Stovall
Defendant:
Scott Vowell and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murry v. Hodges Trucking Co. et al
as 2:2008cv00025
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Murry and James Arthur Murry
Defendant:
Hodges Trucking Co., Hodges Trucking Co., Christopher Bernard Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
