Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
GOODWIN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv04708
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER GOODWIN and MICHAEL GOODWIN
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CAPTAIN JAMES CLARK, DETECTIVE JAMES PITTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALLS et al v. K&C EEXECUTIVE PROTECTION LLC
as 2:2023cv01110
Plaintiff: Andrew Walls, Brianna Brewer, Terrance Peters and others
Defendant: K&C Executive Protection LLC
STOLTZ v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv01585
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff: JAMES CLARK STOLTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MCCOY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv01458
Plaintiff: SHERMAN MCCOY
Defendant: OFFICER FRANK RUFFIN, Officer JAMES CLARK, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STOLTZ v. BERRYHILL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv02736
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff: JAMES CLARK STOLTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
QVC HK HOLDINGS, LLC v. CLARKE
as 2:2017cv01923
Plaintiff: QVC HK HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant: JAMES CLARKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SAGE et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05832
Plaintiff: BELINDA SAGE , OSCAR TORRES , DORIS LAWSON and others
Defendant: MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MUTH v. CLARK
as 2:2013cv00485
Plaintiff: ROBERT MUTH
Defendant: JAMES CLARK, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CLARKE v. HALL et al
as 2:2011cv03218
Plaintiff: JAMES CLARKE
Defendant: COLEMAN HALL , CHARLES IRIZARRY , BARRY HAZZARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65814
Plaintiff: JAMES CLARK
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?