Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hartman v. Medina County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2018cv02196
Respondent:
Thomas Miller Medina County Sheriff's Office, State of Ohio, Medina County Court of Common Pleas, State of Ohio and others
Petitioner:
Mr. Matthew James Hartman and Matthew James Hartman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Donald Hartman v. Warden, et al
as 15-15754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD JAMES HARTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, in his individual capacity, INSPECTOR WARREN, B. A. HARLEY, Classification, in his individual capacity and others
Hartman v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2015cv01996
Plaintiff:
Donald James Hartman
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Terry Royal, Inspector Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartman v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 6:2015cv01941
Plaintiff:
Donald James Hartman
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartman v. Medina County Sheriff's Office et al.
as 1:2015cv02187
Petitioner:
Matthew James Hartman
Respondent:
State of Ohio, Medina County Court of Common Pleas, Medina County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Crenshaw v. Kirkpatrick
as 12-3290
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Crenshaw
Defendant:
Robert H. Kirkpatrick, Superintendent, M. Kearney, Captain, Scott Andruiz, Sgt. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
James Hartman, Sergerant, Dennis McCaione, C.O., Pat Connolly, Food Admin. and others
Crenshaw v. Kirkpatrick
as 10-368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Crenshaw
Defendant:
Robert Kirkpatrick, Superintendent, M. Kearney, Captain, Scott Andruiz, Sgt. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
James Hartman, Sergerant, Dennis McCaione, C.O., Pat Connolly, Food Admin. and others
Crenshaw v. Kirkpatrick et al
as 6:2008cv06186
Plaintiff:
William Crenshaw
Defendant:
Robert Kirkpatrick, James Hartman, Dennis McCaione and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
