Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Roudabush v. Luptotsky et al
as 8:2018cv00311
Plaintiff:
James L Roudabush, Jr
Defendant:
Mr Luptotsky, F Brockington, Lt Barberena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv03466
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Roudabush v. Warden FCI Williamsburg
as 8:2017cv03417
Petitioner:
James L Roudabush, Jr
Respondent:
Warden FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv03359
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Roudabush v. Maddox et al
as 8:2017cv03254
Defendant:
Glenn Maddox, CO Stone, CO Nichols and others
Plaintiff:
James L Roudabush, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
James Roudabush, Jr. v. McKool, et al
as 16-4236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MCKOOL, Lt., Supv. of SHU, WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, C. DYNAN, Ass't Warden and others
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Renee Bumb, et al
as 16-3404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RENEE M. BUMB, WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
James Roudabush, Jr. v. McKool, et al
as 16-3403
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MCKOOL, Lt., Supv. of SHU, WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, C. DYNAN, Ass't Warden and others
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Reyes, et al
as 16-2724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
REYES, CAPTAIN, VINCENT, LT. and WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Bitener, et al
as 16-2723
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BITENER, LT., T. JONES, SANCHEZ, DET. and others
Defendant:
KOEPPEN, MARCHANELLO, LT., GRANT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
