Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Matthew E Orso v. Todd Disner et al
as 2:2024cv01544
Plaintiff:
Matthew E Orso In his capacity as court appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com
Petitioner:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc
Defendant:
Todd Disner, Trudy Gilmond, LLC, Trudy Gilmond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(HC) Baca v. Robertson
as 2:2022cv01481
Petitioner:
James Martin Baca, Sr.
Respondent:
The People of the State of California and James Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthew E Orso v. Todd Disner et al
as 2:2021mc00325
Defendant:
Trudy Gilmond, David Kettner, David Sorrells and others
Petitioner:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc
Plaintiff:
Matthew E Orso In his capacity as court appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com
(PC) Victory v. Shaffer et al
as 1:2020cv00738
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Victory
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, James Martin, Jennifer Shaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Koenig et al
as 3:2019cv01273
Defendant:
Craig Koenig, James Martin and Pete Labahn
Plaintiff:
Cesar A. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv09575
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
James Martin Grajeda v. Josie Gastelo
as 8:2018cv00107
Respondent:
Josie Gastelo
Petitioner:
James Martin Grajeda
Gene Sigal v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2017cv04851
Defendant:
Priscilla Ashburn, Tasha Beard, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
S S, L. S. and Gene Sigal
GMYL, L.P. v. James Martin et al
as 2:2016cv06518
Defendant:
Copa Di Vino, Does, James Martin and others
Plaintiff:
GMYL, L.P.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
