Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Berestoff v. Amos et al
as 3:2017cv00077
Defendant:
Russell Amos, Clackamas County Circuit Court, Clackamas County District Attorneys Office and others
Plaintiff:
James Maxwell Worthington Berestoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berestoff v. King County Department of Public Health et al
as 2:2016cv01159
Plaintiff:
James Maxwell Worthin Berestoff
Defendant:
King County Department of Public Health, Jail Health Staff, King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Green v. Director/Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2014cv00965
Plaintiff:
James Maxwell Green
Defendant:
Director/Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Paramo, Ed Rozo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berestoff v. USA
as 3:2012cv01659
Petitioner:
James Maxwell Worthington Berestoff
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Berestoff v. Multnomah County Health Dept. et al
as 6:2010cv00851
MCDC ID # 707872:
James Maxwell Worthin Berestoff
Defendant:
Corrections Health, Mental Health Section, Multnomah County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berestoff v. Multnomah County Sheriffs Office et al
as 6:2010cv00480
Plaintiff:
James Maxwell W. Berestoff
Defendant:
Multnomah County Sheriffs Office and Deputy Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berestoff v. Multnomah County Health Department - Corrections Health
as 3:2009cv00695
Petitioner:
James Maxwell Worthington Berestoff
Respondent:
Multnomah County Health Department - Corrections Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
