Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Michael Bruzzone v. James McManis, et al
as 22-16474
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. BRUZZONE
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES MCMANIS, WILLIAM FAULKNER and WILLIAM HASKELL ALSUP
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Yi Shao v. John Roberts, Jr., et al
as 22-15857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YI TAI SHAO, AKA Linda Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, Jr., ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, STEPHEN G. BREYER and others
(PS) Shao v. Roberts, et al.
as 2:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Yi Tai Shao and Linda Shao
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M. Kennedy, Stephen Breyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
v. SHAO et al
as 2:2022at00196
Defendant:
Yi Tai SHAO, John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Yi Tai Shao v. John Roberts, et al
as 21-5210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee:
John G. Roberts, Chief Justice, Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice, Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice and others
Yi Tai Shao v. John Roberts, et al
as 19-5014
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Supreme Court, Rice Pichon, BJ Fadem and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yi Tai Shao, Esquire, Attorney and Yi Tai Shao
SHAO v. KENNEDY et al
as 1:2018cv01233
Plaintiff:
YI TAI SHAO
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruzzone v. McManis et al
as 3:2018cv01235
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Bruzzone
Defendant:
James McManis , William Faulkner and William H. Alsup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bruzzone v. McManis et al
as 3:2018mc80005
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Bruzzone
Defendant:
James McManis, William Whitcomb Faulkner and William H. Alsup
Bruzzone v. Intel Corporation Legal Department et al
as 3:2016mc80111
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Bruzzone
Defendant:
Intel Corporation Legal Department, William Faulkner, James McManis and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
