Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Slaikeu v. Withrow, et al.
as 26-3649
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN SLAIKEU
Defendant:
DARREN WITHROW, AUSTIN EISENMAN, UNDERHILL and others
Kone v. Milburn et al
as 3:2026cv00212
Plaintiff:
Tidiane Kone
Defendant:
James Milburn and Justin Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Boyd v. Milburn et al
as 1:2026cv00002
Plaintiff:
Josiah Lumumba Boyd
Defendant:
James Milburn and Michael Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Marquez v. Noll et al
as 3:2025cv00121
Plaintiff:
Andrew Marquez
Defendant:
Erica Noll, Khristopher Staples, Gage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bachmeier v. Milburn
as 3:2025cv00075
Petitioner:
Steven Curtis Bachmeier
Defendant:
James Milburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Slaikeu v. Withrow et al
as 3:2025cv00063
Plaintiff:
Jonathan A. Slaikeu
Defendant:
Darren Withrow, Austin Eisman, Zechariah Kehnau and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Slaikeu v. Mcclenahan, et al.
as 24-582
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN ALEXANDER SLAIKEU
Defendant / Appellee:
H. MCCLENAHAN, Sgt., L. DEBOARD, JAMES MILBURN, Superintendant and others
Slaikeu, et al. v. Deboard, et al.
as 24-580
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN ALEXANDER SLAIKEU, RICHARD LOCKWOOD, DEREK ADAMS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
L. DEBOARD, Sgt. Superintendent, J. BROWN, Superintendant I, PHEASANT, Sgt. and others
Slaikeu, et al. v. Deboard, et al.
as 23-3897
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN ALEXANDER SLAIKEU
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LOCKWOOD, KENNETH ADAMS and DEREK ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
L. DEBOARD, Sgt. Superintendent, J. BROWN, Superintendant I, PHEASANT, Sgt. and others
Slaikeu v. Mcclenahan, et al.
as 23-3904
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN ALEXANDER SLAIKEU
Defendant / Appellee:
MCCLENAHAN, Sgt., L. DEBOARD, Sgt., JAMES MILBURN, Superintendant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
