Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Smith v. U.S.P. Hazelton
as 5:2017cv00114
Petitioner:
James Preston Smith
Respondent:
U.S.P. Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. United States
as 5:2017cv03592
Petitioner:
James Preston Smith
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv05060
Petitioner:
James Preston Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. United States of America
as 5:2009cv01257
Movant:
James Preston Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Smith v. The United States, et al
as 5:2007cv00526
Plaintiff:
James Preston Smith
Defendant:
The United States, et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. The United States et al
as 5:2007cv00285
Plaintiff:
James Preston Smith
Defendant:
The United States, The FPOB, Warden VEACH THP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. The United States et al
as 5:2007cv00225
Plaintiff:
James Preston Smith
Defendant:
The United States and BATF Defendants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. The United States et al
as 5:2007cv00151
Plaintiff:
James Preston Smith
Defendant:
The United States et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. The United States
as 5:2007cv00114
Plaintiff:
James Preston Smith
Defendant:
The United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. The United States et al
as 5:2007cv00113
Petitioner:
James Preston Smith
Defendant:
The United States, William Turner, Robert Irons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
