Cases 1 - 10 of 161
Prater v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00888
Plaintiff:
Randall T. Prater
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Walter A. McNeil, Harry K. Singletary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santoyo v. McDonough
as 9:2010cv80787
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Santoyo
Defendant:
James R. McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bell v. McDonough et al
as 3:2009cv00202
Plaintiff:
Gregory V. Bell
Defendant:
James R. McDonough, R. Bryant, E. Madden and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Biddle et al v. Prison Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv20391
Plaintiff:
Mary Biddle, Elizabeth Biddle and Patricia Biddle
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Inc., State of Florida Department of Corrections, James R. McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hughes v. McDonough
as 1:2008cv22451
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Hughes
Defendant:
James R. McDonough
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WILLIAMS v. MCDONOUGH
as 4:2008cv00393
Plaintiff:
WILLIE JOSEPH WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
COLEMAN v. MCDONOUGH
as 3:2008cv00205
Plaintiff:
LARRY COLEMAN
Defendant:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoot v. Attorney General of the State of Florida
as 9:2008cv80348
Petitioner:
Timothy J. Hoot
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Florida, Attorney General of the State of Florida, James R. McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stroud v. McDonough et al
as 0:2007cv60747
Plaintiff:
Bill Stroud
Defendant:
James R. McDonough, James R. McDonough and Bill McCollum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SNEED v MCDONOUGH
as 5:2008cv00081
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE EUGENE SNEED
Defendant:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH, S M CULPEPPER, WHITFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
