Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Ray v. Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
James Ray
Defendant:
Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ray v. Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
James Ray
Defendant:
Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ray v. Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
James Ray
Defendant:
Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ray v. Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
as 3:2024oe00074
Plaintiff:
James Ray
Defendant:
Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ray v. Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
as 3:2024oe00075
Plaintiff:
James Ray
Defendant:
Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ray v. Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
as 3:2024oe00077
Plaintiff:
James Ray
Defendant:
Jeff Wyler Hillcrest, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
James Norvell v. Scott Jordan
as 21-5503
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT JORDAN, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES RAY NORVELL
Norvell v. Hart
as 5:2021cv00007
Petitioner:
James Ray Norvell
Respondent:
DeEdra Hart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abels, et al v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, et al
as 1:2020op45113
Plaintiff:
William Anthony Mitchell (deceased), by and through daughter and next of kin, Felicia Leonard, Timothy Jay Minchew, Sherri Gates and others
Defendant:
Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Mallinckrodt PLC, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation and others
Petitioner:
Rocklyn S. Smith
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
