Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02193
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
THOMPSON-LOTT v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv12361
Plaintiff:
JANICE THOMPSON-LOTT and JAMES THOMPSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BLAND et al v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2013cv02985
Plaintiff:
COREY BLAND and VIRGINIA BLAND
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK , CITY OF NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT , NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF STATE POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GREEN et al v. HOLMES et al
as 1:2013cv02752
Plaintiff:
DONTE GREEN and SHERRI GOLDBERG
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HOLMES, JUDITH GENTILINI, E. DIBENEDETTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
E.R. v. LOPATCONG TOWNSHIP MIDDLE SCHOOL et al
as 3:2013cv01550
Plaintiff:
E.R.
Defendant:
LOPATCONG TOWNSHIP MIDDLE SCHOOL , LOPATCONG TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT , LOPATCONG TOWNSHIP SCHOOL BOARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
E.R., v. LOPATONG TOWNSHIP MIDDLE SCHOOL et al
as 3:2012cv02449
Plaintiff:
E.R.,
Defendant:
LOPATONG TOWNSHIP MIDDLE SCHOOL, LOPATCONG TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT, LOPATCONG TOWNSHIP SCHOOL BOARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TEANECK POLICEMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION LOCAL 215 et al v. TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK
as 2:2009cv06339
Plaintiff:
TEANECK POLICEMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION LOCAL 215, GERARD ROSANO, JOHN ABRAHAM and others
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
