Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
THOMPSON v. RECKTENWALD
as 1:2016cv00246
Petitioner:
JAMES THOMPSON
Respondent:
MONICA RECKTENWALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
THOMPSON et al v. BARNETT OUTDOORS et al
as 2:2015cv01354
Plaintiff:
JAMES THOMPSON and PATRICIA THOMPSON
Defendant:
BARNETT OUTDOORS LLC and DUNHAM'S ATHLEISURE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SCHAFLE et al v. TAKATA CORPORATION et al
as 2:2014cv06628
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SCHAFLE, SIAN SCHAFLE, TED PEPIN and others
Defendant:
TAKATA CORPORATION, TK HOLDINGS, INC., HIGHLAND INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
THOMPSON v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2014cv02808
Plaintiff:
JAMES THOMPSON
Defendant:
LARRY THOMPSON, CHARLES NABER, JULIO M. ALGARIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2014cv02809
Plaintiff:
JAMES THOMPSON
Defendant:
LARRY THOMPSON, CHARLES NABER, JULIO M. ALGARIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. DeRose
as 4:2013cv02589
Petitioner:
James Thompson
Respondent:
Dominic DeRose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
THOMPSON v. PATTON et al
as 2:2013cv02023
Plaintiff:
JAMES THOMPSON
Defendant:
BRIAN J. PATTON, DAVID ORTIZ, J. NASH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv04717
Plaintiff:
JAMES THOMPSON
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON et al v. HUSQVARNA OUTDORR PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv00553
Plaintiff:
JAMES THOMPSON and TRISA THOMPSON
Defendant:
HUSQVARNA OUTDORR PRODUCTS, INC., THE VERNON DELL TRACTOR SALES COMPANY and AARON RENTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
