Cases 21 - 30 of 59
MOORE v. LUTHER et al
as 2:2019cv00576
Respondent:
SUPT. JAMEY LUTHER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cedeno v. Luther et al
as 5:2019cv00390
Respondent:
JAMEY LUTHER, PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BERKS COUNTY
Petitioner:
Anthony Cedeno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cedeno v. Luther et al
as 1:2019cv00023
Respondent:
Jamey Luther and PA State Attorney General
Petitioner:
Anthony Cedeno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Faison v. Luther et al
as 1:2018cv02453
Respondent:
Jamey Luther and PA State Attorney General
Petitioner:
Nafis Antuan Faison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Faison v. Luther
as 1:2018cv02440
Respondent:
Jamey Luther and PA State Attorney General
Petitioner:
Nafis Antuan Faison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CINTRON v. LUTHER et al
as 2:2018cv05537
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT JAMEY LUTHER and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER
Petitioner:
LUIS G. ZAYAS CINTRON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pennsylvania Institutional Law Project et al v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2018cv02100
Plaintiff:
Abolitionist Law Center, Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Institutional Law Project and others
Defendant:
Shirley Moore Smeal, Tabb Bickell, John E. Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2018cv02099
Plaintiff:
Davon R. Hayes
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Tabb Bickell, Shirley Moore Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER v. NOEL et al
as 3:2018cv00202
Defendant:
Dr. PAUL NOEL, SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, JAY COWAN and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HARPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HARPER v. NOEL et al
as 2:2018cv04163
Defendant:
DR. PAUL NOEL, SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, CHCA KOWALEWSKI and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HARPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
