Cases 1 - 10 of 381
BALL v. DOES 1-X et al
as 4:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
DENNIS ANDREW BALL
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-X, JANE DOES 1-X, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-X and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. 4201 Orlando, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
4201 Orlando, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doe No.1 et al v. Rajveer LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2, Jane Doe #3 and others
Defendant:
RAJVEER LLC, ATHARV, LLC, RAJPRABHU HOTEL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1589 Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA)
In re: 9000 SW 63RD COURT LLC, et al
as 24-10503
Petitioner:
In re: 9000 SW 63RD COURT LLC, 6301 COLLINS AVE 1008 LLC and SAMARK LOPEZ BELLO
Respondent:
CARLOS EDUARDO MARRON, JANE DOE, C.R., A Minor and others
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Doe v. Coffee Regional Medical Center, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Coffee Regional Medical Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MG Freesites LTD, et al v. Jane Doe
as 24-90001
Petitioner:
MG FREESITES LTD, MG FREESITES II LTD, MINDGEEK S.A.R.L. and others
Respondent:
JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE and JOHN DOE #2
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
In re: Bondary McCall
as 23-14099
Petitioner:
In re: BONDARY MCCALL
Respondent:
CLERK - NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, JOHN OR JANE DOE, REBECCA and others
Leon BrightIn re: Leon Bright
as 23-13749
Petitioner:
In re: LEON BRIGHT
Respondent:
CITY OF TAMPA, J. LAMBERT, CHRISTINA M. MITCHELL and others
Doe v. Effingham Health Systems Foundation, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, Janet Roe and Jane Smith
Defendant:
Effingham Health System Foundation, Inc. doing business as Effingham Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
