Cases 1 - 10 of 371
Kolak v. Backerville, et al
as 24-1182
Plaintiff:
WALTER M.J. KOLAK
Defendant:
DENISE BACKERVILLE, MR. CARTER, ARAPHAHOE SHERIFF, ARAPAHOE COUNTY and others
Pittman v. Pickett, et al
as 24-1153
Plaintiff:
EMANUEL PITTMAN
Defendant:
PICKETT, C/O, FONTEROT, C/O, PLATO, C/O and others
Amphly v. State of New Mexico et al
as 1:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Amphly
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, Michelle Lujan Grisham, Alisha Tafoya Lucero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Frantz v. State of Kansas, et al
as 24-3032
Plaintiff:
BARBARA FRANTZ
Defendant:
STATE OF KANSAS, JEFF ZMUDA, Secretary of Corrections, GLORIA GEITHER, Warden, Topeka correctional facility and others
Scott v. Garfield County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 5:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Shyesha Scott
Defendant:
Garfield County Criminal Justice Authority, Daylen Rivers and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Monae Green, Marylin Monae Porter and Lamone M Johnson
Defendant:
Williams Hobbs, FNU Walls, FNU Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jolliff v. Rogers County Sheriff's Department, The et al
as 4:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kathy Jolliff
Defendant:
Rogers County Sheriff's Department, The, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stauch (ID 129417) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03027
Plaintiff:
Letecia Stauch
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Darcie Holthaus, Donna Hook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaves v. Kory, et al
as 24-1048
Plaintiff:
RODNEY DOUGLAS EAVES
Defendant:
MS. KORY, JERRY ROARK, DANNY SALAZAR and others
Garcia v. Grabowski, et al
as 24-1042
Plaintiff:
TOMAS M. GARCIA
Defendant:
GENE GRABOWSKI, TERRY JAQUES, DEAN WILLIAMS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
