Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Chonghee Kim, et al v. USBC, Los Angeles
as 19-70121
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN HOOSHIM, CHONGHEE JANE KIM and ALEXANDRE OH
Undetermined:
EDWARD M. WOLKOWITZ, Chapter 7 Trustee
Other:
In re: CHONGHEE JANE KIM
Respondent:
USBC, LOS ANGELES
Joseph Shalant v. State Bar of California, et al
as 17-55050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH LEIB SHALANT
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, JANE KIM, JOSEPH R. CARLUCCI and others
Joseph L. Shalant v. State Bar of California et al
as 2:2016cv01069
Defendant:
State Bar Court Judg Lucy Armendariz, Joseph R. Carlucci, Jane Kim and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Shalant
Petchel v. Techlink Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv05435
Defendant:
Techlink Systems, Inc. , Jane Kim and Steven Kim
Plaintiff:
Stephen M Petchel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv05202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jamisi Calloway v. Frederic Baker, et al
as 14-16352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
FREDERIC S. BAKER, LEILANIE LASOLA, SCOTT J. DREXEL and others
Calloway v. Baker et al
as 3:2013cv03266
Plaintiff:
Jamisi Jermaine Calloway
Defendant:
Frederic S. Baker, Leilanie Lasola, Scott J. Drexel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynn Gavin v. USDC-CASF
as 13-71344
:
In re: LYNN GAVIN
Petitioner:
LYNN GAVIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
BARTHOLOMEW MURPHY, MICHAEL J. ANTONINI, RICH HILLIS and others
Lynn Gavin v. Bartholomew Murphy, et al
as 13-15622
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYNN GAVIN
Defendant - Appellee:
BARTHOLOMEW MURPHY, MICHAEL J. ANTONINI, RICH HILLIS and others
Gavin v. Murphy et al
as 4:2012cv05864
Plaintiff:
Lynn Gavin
Defendant:
Bartholomew Murphy, Michael J. Antonini, Rich Hillis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
