Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Daniel Matthews v. Debra Hascall, et al
as 19-35949
Defendant:
CITY OF PENDLETON, COUNTY OF UMATILLA, OR, Individually and in their official capacities
Defendant / Appellee:
J. PECK, Assistant Superintendent at EOCI, MITCH MORROW, Deputy Director of ODOC, RILEY, Correctional Officer at EOCI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL J. MATTHEWS
Matthew Daniels v. Casey Cleaver, et al
as 19-35231
Defendant / Appellee:
CASEY CLEAVER, RHONDA GORE, STEPHEN COOK and others
Defendant:
TAMMY GREINER, C. CLEMENTS, COLLETTE PETERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW RYAN DANIELS
Matthews v. Carey et al
as 2:2018cv01618
Defendant:
B. Amsberry, Mitch Morrow, Kevin Brockcamp and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv00285
Defendant:
Cory Claus, Casey Cleaver, C. Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ryan Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Hascall et al
as 2:2017cv00785
Defendant:
Brian Belleque, Kim Brockamp, City of Pendleton, County of Umatilla, OR and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goninan v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2016cv01999
Plaintiff:
Nathan R. Goninan
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Colette Peters, Birdie Worley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tony French v. Mitch Morrow, et al
as 12-35472
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY FRENCH
Defendant - Appellee:
MITCH MORROW, Deputy Director and BIRDIE (JANET) WORLEY, Rules Coordinator, 2575 Center N.E. Admin Bldg Salem OR 97301, 4667
Lamb v. Franke et al
as 2:2012cv00276
Defendant:
S. Franke, Lieutenant McMillen, C/O Ransier and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Gordon Lamb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. Morrow et al
as 2:2011cv01272
Plaintiff:
Tony French
Defendant:
Mitch Morrow and Birdie (Janet) Worley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
