Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jiron, et al v. Davidson, et al
as 14-1004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE M. JIRON
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
JANICE B. DAVIDSON, STEVEN BERNARD, LAURIE A. BOORAS and others
Jiron v. Davidson et al
as 1:2013mc00202
Plaintiff:
Lawrence M. Jiron
Defendant:
Janice B. Davidson, Steven Bernard, Laurie A Booras and others
Depineda v. Clements, et al
as 12-1489
Petitioner - Appellant:
MANUEL SESARIO DEPINEDA
Respondent - Appellee:
TOM CLEMENTS, Warden of all CDOC, JANICE B. DAVIDSON, C.J. Colorado Ct of Appeals and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
DePineda v. Clements et al
as 1:2012cv03089
Petitioner:
Manuel DePineda
Respondent:
Tom Clements, Janice B. Davidson and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DePineda v. Clements et al
as 1:2012cv02675
Petitioner:
Manuel DePineda
Respondent:
Tom Clements and Janice B. Davidson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Jackson, et al
as 10-1111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
VERA JACKSON, MARY J MULLARKEY, Chief Justice, JANICE B. DAVIDSON, Chief Judge and others
Jackson v. Jackson, et al
as 10-1060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
VERA JACKSON, MARY J MULLARKEY, Chief Justice, JANICE B. DAVIDSON, Chief Judge and others
Jackson v. Jackson et al
as 1:2010cv00122
Plaintiff:
David Jackson
Defendant:
Vera Jackson, Mary J. Mullarkey, Janice B. Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Jackson v. Davidson, et al
as 07-1389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JANICE B. DAVIDSON, Chief Judge and MARY MULLARKEY, Chief Judge
Jackson v. Davidson et al
as 1:2007cv01763
Plaintiff:
David Jackson
Defendant:
Janice B. Davidson and Mary Mullarkey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
