Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Jay Vermillion v. Mark Levenhagen, et al
as 14-2327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAY F. VERMILLION
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK E. LEVENHAGEN, Superintendent, SALLY NOWATZKE, Case Counselor WCU, HOWARD MORTON, Administrative Assistant ISP and others
Jay Vermillion v. Mark Levenhagen
as 12-2436
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAY F. VERMILLION
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK E. LEVENHAGEN, Superintendent
Yost v. GeoResources Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01307
Plaintiff:
Cathy E. Yost
Defendant:
GeoResources Inc. , Halcon Resources Corporation, Frank A. Lodzinski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vann v. Jefferson County Sheriff's Department
as 2:2012cv01834
Plaintiff:
Jay F Vann
Defendant:
Jefferson County Sheriff's Department
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vermillion v. Superintendent
as 3:2012cv00150
Petitioner:
Jay F Vermillion
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vann v. Hale et al
as 2:2012cv00495
Plaintiff:
Jay F Vann
Defendant:
Michael Hale, Swanson Service Corporation, Katrina Ross and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vann v. Hale et al
as 2:2012cv00494
Petitioner:
Jay F Vann
Respondent:
Michael Hale, Randy Christian and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vann v. Ross et al
as 2:2012cv00497
Plaintiff:
Jay F Vann
Defendant:
Katrina Ross, Anne Marie Adams, Cindy Collins and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vann v. Hale et al
as 2:2012cv00496
Plaintiff:
Jay F Vann
Defendant:
Michael Hale, Randy Christian, Reeves and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Moynihan, Jr. v. Jay Wisman
as 11-35888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL FRANCIS MOYNIHAN, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JAY F WISMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
