Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Timothy Olmos v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 23-15892
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY PAUL OLMOS, named as Timothy Olmos, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES L RYAN, named as Charles Ryan, RICHARD PRATT, MARK SHIPMAN and others
Johnny Walls-Bey v. Jeff Wrigley
as 23-15428
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHNNY RAY WALLS-BEY, AKA Johnny Procopio, AKA Johnny Ray Walls
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFF WRIGLEY
Walls-Bey v. Wrigley
as 2:2023cv00157
Petitioner:
Johnny Ray Walls-Bey
Respondent:
Jeff Wrigley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierson-Haupt v. Wrigley et al
as 3:2022cv08237
Petitioner:
Tyler Matthew Pierson-Haupt
Respondent:
Jeff Wrigley and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Timothy Olmos v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 22-16804
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY PAUL OLMOS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, RICHARD PRATT, MARK SHIPMAN and others
Mapes v. Hart et al
as 2:2022cv01642
Plaintiff:
Charles Russell Mapes
Defendant:
Unknown Hart, A Moore, Brin Hoffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valdez #275108 v. Shinn et al
as 3:2021cv08269
Plaintiff:
Ysidro Juan Valdez
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Hennry, Vanessa Headstream and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Varela v. Centurion Health Services of Arizona LLC et al
as 3:2021cv08172
Plaintiff:
David Noperi Varela
Defendant:
Centurion Health Services of Arizona LLC, David Shinn, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore #337243 v. Wrigley et al
as 3:2021cv08159
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Aaron Moore
Defendant:
Jeff Wrigley, GEO Group, WellPath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Shinn et al
as 3:2020cv08246
Defendant:
Jeff Wrigley, David Shinn, Correct Care Solutions/WellPath and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Charles Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
