Cases 101 - 107 of 107
NOVOTNY v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN et al
as 2:2009cv04677
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE NOVOTNY
Defendant:
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN and THE HARTFORD COMPREHENSIVE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
STEINBRECHER v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2008cv03905
Plaintiff:
DEBRA STEINBRECHER
Defendant:
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, INCORPORATED, QUEST DIAGNOSTICS CLINICAL LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
FULLMAN v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2008cv02546
Plaintiff:
ANDREW FULLMAN
Defendant:
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, SANDRA MCNEAL, KIMBERLY K. GRESKO and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HOLLIMAN v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv02039
Plaintiff:
RUFUS HOLLIMAN, JR.
Defendant:
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC., CIGNA CORPORATION, CIGNA CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TRIBUIANI et al v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv01219
Plaintiff:
DENISE TRIBUIANI and SAMUEL TRIBUIANI
Defendant:
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY and others
Cross Claimant:
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL and others
Cross Defendant:
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
