Cases 21 - 30 of 192
Hernandez v. Beard et al
as 3:2016cv00470
Petitioner:
Francisco Rene Hernandez
Respondent:
Jeffery Beard and Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Beard
as 3:2016cv00699
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lewis Jones
Defendant:
Jeffery Beard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wimberly v. Malmendier, et al
as 2:2016cv00279
Plaintiff:
Larry Wimberly
Defendant:
Jeffery Beard , A. Brager , N. Grannis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perez v. Beard et al
as 2:2016cv00073
Plaintiff:
Arthur Richard Perez
Defendant:
Jeffery Beard, Eric Arnold, Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trinidad Ledesma v. Calif Rehab Center et al
as 5:2015cv02638
Defendant:
Jeffery Beard, Jeffrey Beard, Calif Rehab Center and others
Plaintiff:
Trinidad Ledesma
Roberto Enrique Arriaga v. Chris Le et al
as 5:2015cv02616
Plaintiff:
Roberto Enrique Arriaga
Defendant:
Jeffery Beard, Jeffery Beard, California Rehabilitation Center and others
Dawson v. Commissioner of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2015cv01867
Plaintiff:
Issac Da'bour Dawson
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Jeffery Beard, Dave Davey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Julian J Alexander v. Jeffery Beard et al
as 5:2015cv02528
Petitioner:
Julian J Alexander
Respondent:
Dr Jeffery Beard and Kamala D Harris
Donley v. Beard
as 1:2015cv01816
Petitioner:
Shawn Arlin Donley
Respondent:
Jeffery Beard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawk v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2015cv02529
Plaintiff:
Shawn Hawk
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Board of Parole Hearings, Forensic Assessment Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
