Cases 11 - 20 of 268
Clark v. Corizon et al
as 1:2013cv01918
Plaintiff:
Darren Clark
Defendant:
Corizon, Mary Lou Showalter and Jeffrey Beard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FONTROY v. OWENS et al
as 3:2012cv00227
Plaintiff:
DERRICK DALE FONTROY, I
Defendant:
DAVID S OWENS, JOHN DOE, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Shakur v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2012cv02208
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lewis
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Tabb Bickell, R. Lawler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALFORD v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, AND AGENTS et al
as 2:2012cv01268
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ALFORD
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, AND AGENTS, JEFFREY BEARD, JOSEPH PIAZZO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martinez v. Jones et al
as 3:2012cv01547
Plaintiff:
Juan Martinez
Defendant:
B Jones, John/Jane Doe-8, Shirley Moore-Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COULSTON v. GLUNT et al
as 3:2012cv00154
Plaintiff:
TROY COULSTON
Defendant:
STEVEN GLUNT, KENNETH HOLLIBAUGH, JEFFREY BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. BEARD
as 2:2012cv01000
Petitioner:
FRED JAMES ALLEN
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GARRISON v. BEARD et al
as 2:2012cv03319
Plaintiff:
CHARLES GARRISON
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD, SECRETARY OF CORRECTION AT CAMP HILL and JOHN E. WETZEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEARSON v. BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS INDUSTRY et al
as 3:2012cv00110
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO PEARSON
Defendant:
BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS INDUSTRY, VIEWSONIC CORPORATION, VIEWSONIC CORPORATION'S CFO SUNG YI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Illes, Sr. v. Beard et al
as 1:2012cv00964
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Illes, Sr., M.D.
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Ph.D. , Dorina Varner , Ian Taggart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
