Cases 31 - 40 of 998
Anna Galaza v. Jeh Johnson
as 17-17037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANNA GALAZA
Defendant - Appellee:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05732
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2902
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01862
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hispanic Affairs Project, et al v. Thomas Perez, et al
as 17-5202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Hispanic Affairs Project, Rodolfo Llacua, John Doe, John Doe and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas E. Perez, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Portia Wu, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration, United States Department of Labor and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Western Range Association and Mountain Plains Agricultural Service
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-16558
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sergio Manrique Gutierrez v. Jeh Charles Johnson et al
as 2:2017cv05814
Petitioner:
Sergio Manrique Gutierrez
Respondent:
Jeh Charles Johnson, Melissa W. Maxim, James McCament and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01371
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-16521
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01238
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
