Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Liang v. Johnson et al
as 2:2016cv01212
Plaintiff:
Minhui Liang
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson and Loretta Lynch
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Christiansen v. Obama et al
as 1:2016cv03078
Plaintiff:
Tracy Bower Christiansen
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Loretta Lynch, Jeh Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Rahme v. Dennis et al
as 3:2016cv00816
Plaintiff:
Mohamad Ahmed Rahme
Defendant:
Lynuel Dennis, Loretta E. Lynch, Jeh Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
Smith v. Johnson et al
as 3:2016cv00066
Plaintiff:
John Smith
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson, Loretta Lynch, Leon Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
Singh et al v. Johnson et al
as 2:2015cv12957
Plaintiff:
Ranjit Singh and Ginger Lee Singh
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson, Michael Klinger, Mirash Dedvukaj and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Gadzhieva et al v. Lynch et al
as 2:2015cv02651
Plaintiff:
Oxana V. Gadzhieva and Hugh Haney
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, United States of America, Juan Osuna and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Sheikh v. Jeh Johnson, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2015cv12247
Plaintiff:
Hasan Sheikh
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and USCIS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Kimberg v. Jeh Johnson, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2014cv12962
Plaintiff:
Terrence Kimberg
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and USCIS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Armando Escobar Arreola v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 14-3184
Petitioner:
ARMANDO ESCOBAR ARREOLA, aka Armando Escobar, aka Armando Arreola Escobar, aka Armando Escobar Arreloa
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General and JEH JOHNSON, Secretary of Dept. of Homeland Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
