Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v.Chattem, Inc., et al
as 3:2023cv18932
Defendant:
Jennifer Smith, Chattem, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Multidistrict Litigation
SMITH v. HMS FERRIES INC
as 3:2022cv20153
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER SMITH
Defendant:
HMS FERRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv10507
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv25631
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv18119
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. Barr et al
as 5:2020cv00060
Defendant:
Kathy Lane, Kathleen Hawk Sawyer, Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
Kara Adams
Petitioner:
Gail Owens, Sailor Jones, Quinetta Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv00053
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00409
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
COULTER v. BROWNING et al
as 4:2017cv00533
Plaintiff:
KERI COULTER
Defendant:
AARON BROWNING, JUAN BARAJAS LEON and JENNIFER SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
