Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Shawn July v. Stephen D'Ilio, et al
as 23-3079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN JULY
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN D'ILIO, Administrator
Defendant:
J. HINTZ, Sergeant of Department of Corrections, D. SMITH, KENNETH NELSON, Ex-Associate Administrator and others
ABDUR-RAHEEM v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2018cv10390
Plaintiff:
SHAMSIDDIN ABDUR-RAHEEM
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, JOHN FALVEY, LINDA SANTORO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LIRANZO-BATISTA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv06792
Petitioner:
JENSEN LIRANZO-BATISTA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Askew v. Paone et al
as 3:2010cv02401
Plaintiff:
William Askew
Defendant:
Rhea Paone, Richard Jensen, Tom Horeis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ledoue v. Sabol et al
as 1:2010cv02268
Plaintiff:
Justin Ledoue
Defendant:
Chris Jensen, Mary Sabol, Doll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Jensen et al
as 3:2010cv02047
Plaintiff:
Ishmael Reid
Defendant:
Chris Jensen, Mary Sabol, Dr. Von Kiel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayo v. The County of York et al
as 1:2010cv01869
Plaintiff:
Shannon L. Mayo, Sr.
Defendant:
The County of York, York County Prison Administrators, Prime Care Medical Employees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis v. Jensen et al
as 4:2010cv01486
Plaintiff:
James E. Dennis
Defendant:
Richard Jensen, Jayne Vander-Hey Wright and Mary Jane Denuzzia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
JENSEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2010cv02123
Petitioner:
RONNI TEIST JENSEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Harris v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2007cv00719
Plaintiff:
Richard M. Harris
Defendant:
United States Of America, Alberto Gonalez, Jack Kemp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
