Cases 1 - 10 of 45
SIMS v. JENSEN et al
as 2:2023cv00523
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Defendant:
JENSEN, YARBER, TAWNI TEMPLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYERS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv01796
Petitioner:
THOMAS MYERS
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA, KELLI K. JENSEN, KELLY N. BRYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STRIEGEL v. WHITE et al
as 4:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
JENSEN STRIEGEL
Defendant:
IRAM C WHITE and MILLER TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
GAYDEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00825
Petitioner:
JENSEN DANTRELL GAYDEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
JENSEN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2023cv00806
Plaintiff:
DEBRA JENSEN
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Corbin v. Jensen
as 2:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Danial Corbin
Defendant:
Mary Ellen Jensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jensen v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00525
Petitioner:
Andrew J Jensen
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WEINSCHENK v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2022cv01150
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WEINSCHENK
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, ERIC HOLCOMB, SUZANNE CROUCH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Jensen v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00423
Petitioner:
Andrew J Jenson and Andrew J Jensen
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PURIFOY et al v. JENSEN et al
as 2:2021cv00373
Plaintiff:
HENRY PURIFOY
Defendant:
JENSEN, LYDAY, B. LAMMER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
