Cases 1 - 10 of 591
Ratliff v. Penske Logistics LLC
as 1:2024cv08718
Defendant:
Penske Logistics LLC
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Mason v. Hughes et al
as 4:2024cv04170
Defendant:
Jeff File, Kendall W Hocker, Melissa Shenkel and others
Plaintiff:
Mickey Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gall et al v. Ascend Capventures, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv05982
Defendant:
Ascend Capventures, Inc., Jeremy Leung and Will Basta
Plaintiff:
Jason Gall and Ali Althoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Hill et al v. Figueroa et al
as 1:2024cv06206
Defendant:
C. Madison, J. Adams, M. Figueroa and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farris v. Danley et al
as 2:2024cv02144
Defendant:
Jesse Paul Danley, Kirk Kepley, Chad Schwenke and others
Plaintiff:
James Farris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kyles v. Campbell et al
as 3:2024cv03241
Defendant:
Ann Raghill, Steven Campbell, Liz Mcintosh and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Kyles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keeler v. Cook County
as 1:2024cv05605
Respondent:
Kathleen Marie Burke, . Gallagher, Hickory Hills Police Department and others
Petitioner:
Kevin Keeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Anderson v. Nailor et al
as 3:2024cv50288
Plaintiff:
Jeremy J. Anderson
Defendant:
Sy, Latoya Hughes, Scott A. Nailor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boclair v. Compliance Manager et al
as 3:2024cv01924
Defendant:
Jeremy Bennett, John/Jane Doe 2, Lt. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Boclair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
