Cases 21 - 30 of 520
Robinson v. Goodwin
as 22-30358
Petitioner / Appellant:
Arthur Ray Robinson
Respondent / Appellee:
Jerry Goodwin, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center
Jefferson v. Goodwin et al
as 2:2022cv01093
Plaintiff:
Gary Jefferson
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weston v. Goodwin
as 5:2022cv00964
Plaintiff:
Christopher Weston
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Earl v. Goodwin et al
as 2:2022cv00962
Plaintiff:
Burnell Earl
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Goodwin
as 5:2022cv00941
Plaintiff:
Arthur Ray Robinson
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dunn v. Henshaw et al
as 5:2022cv00736
Plaintiff:
Travis Dunn
Defendant:
Danny Henshaw, Louisiana Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, David Wade Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Goodwin
as 3:2022cv00699
Plaintiff:
Carlos Lewis and Carlos T Lewis
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lukens v. Goodwin
as 22-30018
Petitioner / Appellant:
Stephen Allen Lukens
Respondent / Appellee:
Jerry Goodwin, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center
Imbraguglio v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Dominick Imbraguglio
Defendant:
Sec. James M. LeBlanc, Seth Smith, Warden Jerry Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Imbraguglio et al
as 3:2021cv00735
Defendant:
Dominick August Imbraguglio, James M LeBlanc, Seth Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
