Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Kelly v. Community Protestant Church et al
as 2:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Stephen Patrick Kelly
Defendant:
Community Protestant Church, Bob Everest, Bishop Hales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Kelly v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints et al
as 2:2020cv00056
Defendant:
Kyle spencer, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints and Alan Hansen
Plaintiff:
Stephen P. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Esquivel v. Engineered Structures, Inc. et al
as 9:2017cv00078
Plaintiff:
Jesus Esquivel
Defendant:
Engineered Structures, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mata v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 9:2014cv00135
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Plaintiff:
Jesus Lopez Mata
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mata v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 9:2014cv00096
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Plaintiff:
Jesus Lopez Mata
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. USA
as 6:2013cv00054
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jesus Alberto Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wessel et al v. US Dept of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management
as 6:2011cv00033
Plaintiff:
Katy Wessel and John Mehan
Defendant:
Lewis & Clark County , LaDonna M. Schumacher, Leon M. Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Lopez et al v. Kenyon Noble Limber Co. et al
as 2:2008cv00068
Plaintiff:
Vicente Lopez, Jesus Esquivel and Jose Garcia
Defendant:
Kenyon Noble Limber Co. and Dick Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Rodriguez v. USA
as 1:2008cv00023
Petitioner:
Frank Jesus Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Martinez-Martinez v. USA
as 4:2007cv00083
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jesus Martinez-Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
