Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Avila v. New York City Housing Authority
as 25-1334
Plaintiff:
JIMMY AVILA
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY and CENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE OF THE DISABLED, NEW YORK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv02478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Avila et al v. Davis et al
as 1:2025cv03316
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Avila
Defendant:
Danisha Davis, City of New York, Symone Elizabeth Sylvester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv03090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Avila v. Acacia Network
as 24-2752
Plaintiff:
JIMMY AVILA
Defendant:
NYC ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES, THOMAS GLENOY, APS Senior Supervisor, 1412 COLLEGE AVENUE LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Avila v. ACACIA Network, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00922
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Avila
Defendant:
ACACIA Network, Inc., Trevor Griffiths, Aja Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avila v. ACACIA Network, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00884
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Avila
Defendant:
ACACIA Network, Inc., Trevor Griffiths, Aja Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Avila v. ACACIA Network et al
as 1:2023cv10260
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Avila
Defendant:
ACACIA Network, Aja Douglas, 1212 Grant Realty, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Avila v. ACACIA Network, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07834
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Avila
Defendant:
ACACIA Network, Inc. and Trevor Griffiths
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
