Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Norris v. Madison Detention Center et al
as 3:2021cv03986
Plaintiff:
Kely Norris
Defendant:
Madison Parish Detention Center, Jimmy Shivers, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Madison Correctional Center et al
as 3:2010cv01294
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ray Kelly
Defendant:
Madison Correctional Center, Jimmy Shivers, Forcht Wade Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Burns v. Lydia Smith, et al
as 10-30472
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES BURNS
Defendant - Appellee:
LYDIA SMITH, JIMMY SHIVERS, LARRY COX and others
Berry v. Madison Parish et al
as 3:2010cv00554
Plaintiff:
Tom Taylor Berry
Defendant:
Madison Parish, Wendell Hughes, Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poole v. Shivers et al
as 2:2007cv05534
Plaintiff:
John Poole
Defendant:
Jimmy Shivers and Richard Stalder
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fulton v. Shivers et al
as 3:2009cv01746
Plaintiff:
Andrew Fulton
Defendant:
Jimmy Shivers and Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker
as 3:2009cv01598
Plaintiff:
Spencer Beau Walker
Defendant:
Jimmy Shivers, Larry G Cox, Crocket and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Madison Parish Correctional Center et al
as 3:2009cv01399
Plaintiff:
Delvin Dimon Moore
Defendant:
Madison Parish Correctional Center, Jimmy Shivers, Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Shivers et al
as 3:2009cv01027
Plaintiff:
Donald K Smith
Defendant:
Jimmy Shivers, Larry Cox and James LeBlanc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Smith et al
as 3:2009cv00811
Plaintiff:
Simmie L Hill
Defendant:
Lydia Smith, Larry Cox and Jimmy Shivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
