Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Gonzalez v. JK Hialeah, LLC
as 1:2023cv24742
Plaintiff:
Pedro Luis Gonzalez, Luis Enrique Gonzalez and Osledy Perez
Defendant:
JK HIALEAH LLC and JK Hialeah, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Smith v. JKS Home Improvement, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01509
Plaintiff:
Kayce Smith
Defendant:
JKS Home Improvement, LLC, Jeremy Sager and Brittany Sager
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Finkel v. JK Electrical, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02832
Petitioner:
Dr. Gerald R. Finkel
Respondent:
JK Electrical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Lopez v. JK Maintenance & Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv07399
Plaintiff:
Jackelyn Martinez Lopez
Defendant:
JK Maintenance & Services, Inc. and Jaime Lopez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Laborers' Pension Fund, et al v. Kaat Inc., et al
as 22-3074
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LABORERS' PENSION FUND, LABORERS' WELFARE FUND OF THE HEALTH AND WELFARE DEPARTMENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CHICAGO AND VICINITY, CATHERINE WENSKUS, not individually, but as Administrator of the Funds and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KAAT INC., JK INSTALLATION CORP., KEVIN CICCONE and others
Finkel v. Gaffney-Kroese Electrical Supply Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv01777
Plaintiff:
Dr. Gerald Finkel
Defendant:
Gaffney-Kroese Electrical Supply Corp., Gaffney-Kroese Export Corp., CK & JK LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
TORRES v. JK HIALEAH LLC
as 1:2022cv20438
Plaintiff:
CARLOS TORRES
Defendant:
JK HIALEAH LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Begley v. JK Enterprise Incorporated, et al
as 3:2021cv01031
Plaintiff:
Laurel Begley
Defendant:
JK Enterprise Incorporated an Oregon Corporation doing business as CABARET II, Josephine Jabra Kiraz and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
