Cases 1 - 10 of 151
Montanez v. Gagosian et al
as 5:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Mario Montanez
Defendant:
Steve Gagosian, Troy Stpiette and John/Jane Doe
Jackson-Bey v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Haneef Shakeel Jackson-Bey
Defendant:
FNU Smith and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McCaa v. Antonelli et al
as 5:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Cedriguez McCaa
Defendant:
Antonelli, Mary Welti, Berman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Floyd v. Hurt et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Larry Leroy Floyd and Bardock T Gins
Defendant:
Emancipation judge at Marion Co. Courthouse 2001-2004, John/Jane Doe, Queen Latifah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patrick v. Maertz et al
as 3:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Lana Patrick
Defendant:
Lieutenant Maertz and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sheffield v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00110
Petitioner:
Lance Javon Sheffield
Respondent:
Ricky Dixon, John Doe, John-Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson-Bey v. Carlton et al
as 5:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Shakeel Jhakeel Jacksonbey and Haneef Shakeel Jackson-Bey
Defendant:
E.K. Carlton, J. Burkett, FNU Cordero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gonzalez et al v. Charter Communications, Inc.
as 8:2023cv01994
Plaintiff:
Jen Gonzalez and John/Jane Doe
Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Williams v. Platero et al
as 5:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
Maurice L Williams
Defendant:
B Platero, FNU Morey, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
