Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Byrd v. Corizon, LLC, et al
as 5:2023cv06005
Defendant:
Corizon, LLC,, Corizon, Inc., Corizon, Health, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jeri Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Key v. Doe et al
as 6:2022cv03173
Plaintiff:
Felix Key
Defendant:
John Doe, John 2 Doe, Jane Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shoate et al v. Doe et al
as 4:2013cv00683
Plaintiff:
Harvey Lee Shoate, Jr. and Ruby E. Shoate
Defendant:
John 1 Doe, John 2 Doe, John 3 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fulghum v. Allen et al
as 6:2013cv03248
Plaintiff:
John Fulghum
Defendant:
J Allen, Lee, Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shoemaker v. Merritt et al
as 6:2013cv03115
Plaintiff:
Walter C. Shoemaker
Defendant:
Wayne Merritt, John 1 Doe, John 2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunn v. Mattivi et al
as 4:2013cv00092
Plaintiff:
Adrian L. Dunn, Sr.
Defendant:
Michael Mattivi, John 1 Doe and John 2 Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Herrington v. Nixon et al
as 5:2013cv06022
Defendant:
Jeremiah W. Nixon, George Lombardi, MO Board of Probation & Parole and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Herrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph v. Lombardi et al
as 2:2012cv04325
Plaintiff:
Gary Randolph
Defendant:
George Lombardi, Douglas Prudden, John I Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holly v. Corwin et al
as 4:2012cv01432
Plaintiff:
Rodrick D. Holly
Defendant:
James Corwin, John I Doe, John 2 Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Doe et al
as 2:2012cv04239
Plaintiff:
Cedric Arnez Gibson
Defendant:
John I Doe, John 2 Doe and John 3 Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
