Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Maes et al v. Hochul et al
as 1:2024cv01404
Plaintiff:
Mourad Karim Maes and John Allen Ricks
Defendant:
Kathleen Hochul, Letitia James and Sandra Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv06356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv05109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Security Limits Inc., v. Avangrid Networks, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10124
Defendant:
Prosegur Security Monitoring, Inc., Avangrid Networks, Inc., Avangrid, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Security Limits Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rosenberg et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv04012
Defendant:
Michael Sensese, Robert Kselman, Eugene Porcaro and others
Plaintiff:
Eltha Jordan, Rudy Rosenberg and Jacqueline Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Roe et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv04059
Defendant:
John Doe, Michael Sensese, Robert Kselman and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe 1, Jane Roe 2 and John Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alsaydi v. Five Horsemen Industries et al
as 1:2010cv05719
Plaintiff:
Qaid Alsaydi
Defendant:
Five Horsemen Industries, John Allen, Three Bullets Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Guardian News, Inc. v. Idoni et al
as 7:2008cv10064
Plaintiff:
The Guardian News, Inc.
Defendant:
Timothy C. Idoni and John Allen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
