Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Campbell v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2022cv00076
Petitioner:
John C Campbell
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2017cv04829
Plaintiff:
John C Campbell
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company and Lilly USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Campbell v. Yu
as 14-2511
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John C. Campbell, Derivatively on Behalf of New Energy Systems Group, Basil Malouf, Derivatively on Behalf of New Energy Systems Group and Baseem Malouf, Derivatively on Behalf of New Energy Systems Group
Defendant / Appellee:
Weihe Yu, Junfeng Chen, Shuxian Cui and others
Campbell v. Yu
as 14-2511
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John C. Campbell, Derivatively on Behalf of New Energy Systems Group, Basil Malouf, Derivatively on Behalf of New Energy Systems Group and Baseem Malouf, Derivatively on Behalf of New Energy Systems Group
Defendant - Appellee:
Weihe Yu, Junfeng Chen, Shuxian Cui and others
Campbell et al v. Yu et al
as 7:2012cv03169
Plaintiff:
John C. Campbell , Basil Malouf and Baseem Malouf
Defendant:
Weihe Yu, Junfeng Chen, Nian Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell et al v. Yu et al
as 1:2012cv03169
Plaintiff:
John C. Campbell, Basil Malouf and Baseem Malouf
Defendant:
Weihe Yu, Junfeng Chen, Nian Chen and others
Nominal Defendant:
New Energy Systems Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ss Diversity - Stockholders Suits
CAMPBELL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv31051
Plaintiff:
JOHN C. CAMPBELL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
