Cases 1 - 10 of 18
FAKE et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2020cv01283
Defendant:
WILLIAM H. KETTERLINUS, BRIAN ZARALLO, ANITA N. BOTCHWAY and others
Plaintiff:
CAITLIN B. FAKE, SUSAN B. FAKE and BRANDON L. FAKE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
FAKE et al v. PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2016cv03893
Plaintiff:
BRANDON L. FAKE
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, KEVIN M. DOUGHERTY, MARGARET T. MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARKE v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2016cv02570
Petitioner:
JOHN CLARKE
Respondent:
MICHAEL OVERMYER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CIFERNI v. BOILERMAKERS LOCAL 13 et al
as 2:2015cv04807
Plaintiff:
JAMES CIFERNI
Defendant:
BOILERMAKERS LOCAL 13, JOSEPH JACOBY, MARTY STANTON and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151
GRIFFIN et al v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv62157
Plaintiff:
JOHN CLARK GRIFFIN and EDNA GRIFFIN
Defendant:
AC&S, INC. , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv51153
Plaintiff:
JOHN CLARK
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
CLARK v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv73810
Plaintiff:
JOHN CLARK
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31617
Plaintiff:
JOHN CLARK
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CLARK v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv64611
Plaintiff:
JOHN CLARK and JOHN CLARK
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DIAMONIQUE CORPORATION v. CLARK et al
as 2:2007cv04997
Plaintiff:
DIAMONIQUE CORPORATION
Defendant:
JOHN CLARK and WENDY LANDES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
