Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Vrh v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 24-1080
Plaintiff:
AARON VRH
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, ELTON JOHN CRENSHAW, Medical Doctor at San Quentin State Prison, J. LEE and others
CRENSHAW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv35048
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN CRENSHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CRENSHAW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv08729
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN CRENSHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Vrh v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 4:2019cv01329
Defendant:
Dr. Lee, Elton John Crenshaw, San Quentin State Prison and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Vrh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Vrh v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2019cv00274
Defendant:
Lee, Elton John Crenshaw, San Quentin State Prison and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Vrh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosquera v. Hininger et al
as 1:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Mosquera and Rodrigo Mosquera
Defendant:
Hininger, Fidencio Cacique, Oscar Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Macy's, Inc.
as 1:2016at00404
Defendant:
Macy's, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Crenshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crenshaw v. Sunham Home Fashions, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00765
Plaintiff:
Crenshaw and John Crenshaw
Defendant:
Sunham Home Fashions, LLC, Macy's, Inc. and Kam Hing Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crenshaw v. Singlton et al
as 2:2016cv02380
Plaintiff:
John Crenshaw
Defendant:
Peconic Bay Medical Center, Riverhead Correelion facility, Curtis Singlton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Crenshaw v. USA
as 15-5551
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN CRENSHAW
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
