Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Porter v. King et al
as 6:2023cv03395
Plaintiff:
Anthony Porter
Defendant:
M King, VerPloeg, M Tizen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diggs v. Patterson et al
as 6:2019cv03225
Plaintiff:
Troy D Diggs
Defendant:
John Daniel Patterson and Dave Andrew Rennier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burkhart v. Petty et al
as 2:2016cv04277
Plaintiff:
Dustin Scott Burkhart
Defendant:
Jim Petty , Tony Wheatley , Cody Worthley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Bryant et al
as 6:2015cv03160
Plaintiff:
Ryan Antonio Lewis
Defendant:
Jacqueline Bryant, Philip Fuhrman, Jonathan David Barker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leslie v. US. Department of the Interior
as 4:2014cv00845
Plaintiff:
John Daniel Leslie
Defendant:
US. Department of the Interior
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Hawkins v. Prudden
as 4:2013cv02506
Petitioner:
John Daniel Hawkins, Jr.
Respondent:
Douglas J. Prudden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawkins v. Prudden
as 4:2013cv02325
Petitioner:
John Daniel Hawkins, Jr.
Respondent:
Douglas J. Prudden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Glickert et al v. The Loop Trolley Transportation Development District, et al.
as 4:2013cv02170
Plaintiff:
Elsie Beck Glickert , Jen Rivenes Jensen , Irene Franklin and others
Defendant:
The Loop Trolley Transportation Development District , The Loop Trolley Company, Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Leslie v. Maida Engineering, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00614
Plaintiff:
John Daniel Leslie
Defendant:
Maida Engineering, Inc. and Guarantee Electrical Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
