Cases 1 - 10 of 10
HARPER v. ADAMS et al
as 5:2021cv00405
Plaintiff:
DAVID LAMAR HARPER
Defendant:
WILLIAM PATRICK ADAMS, REBECCA L GRIST, SHARELL FINCHER LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EMMONS et al v. CITY OF BAINBRIDGE et al
as 1:2021cv00037
Defendant:
Bainbridge Public Safety Department, LADARIC JONES, CHIP WILLIAM NIX and others
Plaintiff:
PETER EMMONS and JOHN DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 1:2020cv00717
Plaintiff:
Oscar Howell and Maria Howell
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and John Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Foote v. Car Protection USA et al
as 1:2019cv04381
Defendant:
Car Protection USA and John Davis
Plaintiff:
Paula Foote
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Davis v. Ford
as 1:2017cv01905
Petitioner:
John Davis
Respondent:
Benjamin Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Cooney et al
as 1:2016cv03844
Plaintiff:
John Davis
Defendant:
Mary Carole Cooney , David J. Burge , Luther W. Beck and others
Amicu:
Robert Ammons , Emelyn Mays and Evangeline Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooler Ink Solutions, Inc. v. Blue Ocean Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2016mi00038
Plaintiff:
Cooler Ink Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Blue Ocean Holdings, Inc., Michael John Davis and Shona W. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Davis v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv00065
Plaintiff:
Thomas John Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Davis et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv00155
Plaintiff:
Debra Davis and John Davis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. DC Medical, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00870
Plaintiff:
Betty F. Davis and John Davis
Defendant:
DC Medical, LLC , Michael T. Kimberl and John Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Movant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
