Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Clark v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv01080
Plaintiff:
Angelica Erika Clark
Defendant:
City of Portland and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Moon v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv00758
Defendant:
Marisa Moon, City of Portland, John Doe 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stoyanoff v. City of Portland, et al
as 3:2020cv01874
Defendant:
Justin D. Damerville, City of Portland and John Does 1-3
Plaintiff:
Dmitri Stoyanoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Hammon et al
as 2:2020cv00323
Defendant:
M. Gower, John Doe #2, 3, 4, 5, R. Persson and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Climax Portable Machine Tools, Inc. v. Trawema GMBH et al
as 3:2018cv01825
Plaintiff:
Climax Portable Machines Tools, Inc. and Climax Portable Machine Tools, Inc.
Defendant:
Trawema GmbH, Gunter Cramer, Simon Heck and others
Rossmann v. Trump et al
as 3:2017cv01034
Defendant:
John Does 1-3, Brian McVeigh, Esq., Jeff Sessions and others
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ye et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2017cv00902
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and John Does 1-3
Plaintiff:
Qiliang Ye and Jin Zhou
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Perini v. NORCOR et al
as 3:2017cv00378
Defendant:
Captain of Operations, John Doe x 3, Medical Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Steven M. Perini
Sgt X 2:
Several Guards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NxSystems, Inc. v. John Does 1-3
as 3:2014cv01301
Defendant:
John Does 1-3
Plaintiff:
NxSystems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gibson v. Clackamas County et al
as 3:2013cv01223
Defendant:
Deputy Adams, Clackamas County, Jane Doe 1-3 and others
Plaintiff:
Tarrie Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
