Cases 1 - 10 of 1,306
Hillman v. Gill et al.
as 3:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Brandon John Hillman
Defendant:
Joseph N. Gill, Tayler Glass, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pointer v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01807
Plaintiff:
Dennis Pointer
Defendant:
Ms. Annette Chambers Smith, Ron O'Brian, Michael Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ward v. Adkisson et al.
as 1:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
Franklin Ward
Defendant:
SHERIFF Phil Stammitti, Shea Adkisson and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Banks v. Doe et al.
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Banks, III
Defendant:
Scott John Doe, Jane Doe Williams and Jane Doe Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rudduck et al v. City of Wilmington et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Brett W. Rudduck and Amanda N. Rudduck
Defendant:
City of Wilmington, Scott E. Baker, Ronald Cravens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Newton v. Kardashian et al.
as 1:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Kimberly Kardashian, Shawn Carter, Kanye West and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
