Cases 1 - 10 of 262
Benites Sosa v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Wilber Jose Benites Sosa
Defendant:
Glendell Hill, Prince William-Manassas Regional Adult Detention Center, Pete Meletis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis et al v. Alva Cano Rodenixto et al
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Tyreek Davis and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Abner Alva Cano Rodenixto, Mark Sawyer, C. Rivas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fuqua v. Centra Health, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Tre'Mane Fuqua
Defendant:
Centra Health, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Boomer v. Novak et al
as 3:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
Bobby Boomer
Defendant:
R. Novak, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Emory and Henry College
as 1:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Emory and Henry College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Carini v. Roberts et al
as 1:2023cv01112
Plaintiff:
Carmen V. Carini and Carmine V. Carini
Defendant:
Roberts, John Doe, D. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Leonard et al
as 3:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
Karl S. Leonard, Ted Knight, John Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Miller v. Mormando et al
as 2:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
Barthonia Miller
Defendant:
Officer Mormando and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sesay v. Philip Hetzner, et al.
as 1:2023cv00929
Plaintiff:
Isatu Sesay
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Philip Hetzner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paton v. City Of Norfolk, Virginia et al
as 2:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
KATHY B PATON and Kathy B. Paton
Defendant:
Virginia City Of Norfolk, JOHN DOE and City of Norfolk, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
