Cases 21 - 30 of 1,690
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv01492
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv01493
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv01494
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc. v. Does 1-100 et al
as 4:2024cv01457
Plaintiff:
Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and XYZ Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Walker et al v. Lawrenz et al
as 4:2024cv01456
Plaintiff:
Callie Walker, Estate of Cleon Johnson, Kahill Johnson and others
Defendant:
Jonathan Lawrenz, John Doe, Madison County, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Laymon v. Innovative Mechanical Solutions, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01438
Plaintiff:
Asia Laymon
Defendant:
Innovative Mechanical Solutions, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Mixon v. Cross et al
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Danny Mixon
Defendant:
Ms. Cross, Mr. Osobrook and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laccinole v. Secure One Financial, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
Christopher Laccinole
Defendant:
Secure One Financial, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
DILLON v. TUSHIG, INC. et al
as 4:2024cv01253
Plaintiff:
JYHEIM DILLON
Defendant:
TUSHIG, INC. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Young v. Bryan Collier et al
as 4:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Marvin Young
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Amber K. Ochoa, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
